Thursday, February 28, 2008
Filtration of Vehicular Exhaust in Road Tunnels
Road tunnels, urban air pollution and filtration - the issues.
http://savewollicreek.8m.com/backnote.html
Electrostatic precipitation: Valuable for removing particulate matter.
Used in Norway, Japan and Australia
http://savewollicreek.8m.com/
New clean air legislation in Austrialia:
An Act to amend the Roads Act 1993 to require pollution filtration equipment to be installed and maintained that will remove particulate matter from air exiting the M5 East motorway tunnel, the proposed Lane Cove Tunnel and the proposed Cross City Tunnel.
http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/NSWBills.nsf/1484fd8a7ada6a26ca25691c001793ed/4ad7c838f7b2318dca256b7a001e28d5?OpenDocument
Valuable for removing oxides of nitrogen and sulfate dioxide
Under experiential use in Norway, Austria and Japan is a gas purification system to remove from the air oxides of nitrogen as well as sulfur dioxide. Far from increasing costs, the Norwegian experience suggests that if air-cleaning technologies are included in the design from the beginning the overall expenditure is reduced.
http://www.clovermoore.com/idx.htm?http://www.clovermoore.com/bligh/speeches/1999/991021-1.htm
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=urban+road+tunnel&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=1994May17.090652.22074%40mel.go.jp&rnum=1
Filtration equipped Tunnels: RX for reduced pollution
Road tunnels equipped with exhaust filtration would tend to reduce exhaust emissions into the general atmosphere by so diverting/accepting traffic, particularly if so providing regionally more direct routes, thereby accommodating greater human activity within a given developed region, and improving the economic competitiveness of older more built up, more pedestrian and transit friendly cities.
The use of filtration in new road tunnels has been advocated by environmentalist activist Bernard Saunders in the New York City Metropolitan region, for a new combined vehicular railway/highway tunnel for relocating the I-287 Cross Westchester Expressway underground
http://www.bh.com.au/m5east/index.htm
And for CO2:
http://cos-mobile.blogspot.com/2011/04/co2-capture-from-vehicular-tunnels-for.html
Recycling Right of Ways and other existing swaths
|
| |
|
|
Avoiding Forseable Conflicts
Introduction
Foreseeable conflicts between transportation needs and real estate development occur when government entities involved with planning matters fail to consider long term needs when they approve real estate projects so situated to significantly raise the costs of future transportation projects, with forseeability be greater for those involving technologies already in widespread use. Such situations include real estate development placed directly in the path of a new or improved roadway, and those placed close enough with a design that does not guard against increasing the costs of future transportation infrastructure construction, such as new structures placed alongside an existing retaining wall that would have to be shored up to replace the existing retaining wall.
Principles
- Greater Mixed Use of Land via Cataloging existing corridors and right of ways, including adjacent properties.
- Acknowledging Long Term Needs and Existing and Foreseeable Future Technologies
- Ensuring that real estate development respect transportation corridor setbacks for maximizing its potential via not placing relatively expensive structures too close, hence minimizing/avoiding future conflicts, such as the demolition of apartments.
- Leaving room to facilitate future transportation infrastructure construction with less disruption and lower cost, for instance leaving space to construct new slurry walls designed for decking over a roadway, along with some capacity addition, including better ramps and additional mainline lanes at traditional chock points for reducing congestion.
- Long Term Planning with more evolutionary and modular Designs
- Greater "bang for buck" with design consideration for future improvements consolidating and reducing costs per benifit.
Saturday, January 5, 2008
Build a Sandpoint, Idaho Tunnel
The group, which promotes the concept of putting portions of the highway beneath the city instead of in the creek, formally asked ITD's director and chairman of the Idaho Transportation Board in April to acknowledge that an objective alternatives analysis is compulsory and needs to be redone with a more transparent public review process. More ...This is a proposal to tunnel a highway beneath a city, as an environmentally preferable alternative to a surface road around a city's waterfront.

"Tunnels of this size, type and depth are quite common, and have been successfully constructed in many developed areas around the world," Stephen Mauss, vice president of Hatch Mott McDonald, said in a July 19 letter to Potter.
Hatch Mott McDonald has constructed some 1,500 miles of tunnel here and abroad, including the tunnel beneath the Detroit River that links the U.S. and Canada and parts of the famed London Underground.
Under the proposal, through-town traffic entering Sandpoint from the Long Bridge would descend below ground near the intersection of Superior Street and First Avenue. Traffic would emerge from the 2,250-foot tunnel near the city's former high school at Pine Street and Euclid Avenue, well within striking distance of U.S. Highway 2. More ...
City of Sandpoint IdahoCitizens for a Sandpoint Tunnel